Sunday, November 25, 2012

Storm Chasers

I still have some work to do on my article. There are a couple of bolded sentences that I need to work on and I'm going to add some info but if anyone has a chance to read, I'd love some more feedback!

hope everyone had a great thanksgiving!!


The sky is darkening.  A whooshing roar, similar to a freight train passing by, is deafening. The trees start to quiver until a violent jolt breaks them in half and their massive trunks become part of the debris dancing in the wind. A roof flies off a house.
No one wants to witness this scene. This is a scene government official’s mandate residents evacuate from. And then there are those people driving towards the storm that everyone else is trying to escape. Most of us know them as storm chasers; some of them like to call themselves “extreme meteorologists.” Regardless of what you call this intriguing group, they are all hunting the most violent prey: nature.
Chasing storms has been around since the 1950s, but became mainstream in 1996 with the movie Twister, and then skyrocketed in 2007 when the Discovery Channel documented it in a widely popular series “Storm Chasers.” Storm chasing is a career for few, and a hobby for most. A storm chaser is a person who pursues imminent or existing severe thunderstorms. Storm chasers stem from all walks of life but most have a formal education or extensive knowledge of meteorology.
Chasing a storm is dangerous on its own, but the real threat comes when the chaser isn’t familiar with weather and storms in general. Professional or seasoned storm chasers know how to track storms and have the proper equipment to help them. These chasers know to look for satellite images that show bright white, high cloud tops that indicate budding storms. They know how to read the radar and track watches and warnings, the latest forecast discussions, and recent surface maps that show change in temperature, dewpoint, wind direction, cold front, or low-pressure system that can set off a storm. Cold air at high altitudes along with warm air close to the ground is favorable for a tornado. Winds at different altitudes blowing in different directions can also signify an impending tornado. It also requires patience. Some storm chasers will drive for 12 hours and not see the storm they were chasing. Ideally, a storm chaser will set up on a hill about three miles away to get the best view. In general, a chaser will ensure they can move perpendicular to a tornado’s path so they can escape if necessary. The same methodology isn’t exactly necessary to find a hurricane. When a hurricane is imminent, you know where to find it.
            Chasing storms is not an activity to be taken lightly, even so, its popularity is staggering. There are estimated to be thousands of storm chasers, and professional tours offer storm chasing experiences for the curious individual. For some, chasing storms is research, for others, it’s educational, but for all, it’s exhilarating. What’s often left un-chased, however, are the psychological aspects of such a dangerous “sport,” and the potential immorality of chasing something that kills people and destroys their homes.
            Psychological profiles of people based on “sensation-seeking” behavior that might identify motivations for chasing storms were created based on a study done by University of Missouri’s School of Natural Resources. The study surveyed people who signed up for a tornado chasing tour and used similar psychological tools that had been used to evaluate people who participate in other high-risk recreations (mountaineering, sky diving, etc).  While mountain climbers and stunt fliers displayed high levels of sensation seeking across all dimensions, recreational storm chasers scored very moderately in regard to sensation-seeking behavior. The researchers hypothesized that this difference in sensation seeking is because recreational storm chasers are drawn to new experiences, rather than the risks involved. 
While storm chasers may be drawn to novelty rather than danger, it is one of the few hobbies that coincide with tragedy, which is the foundation of its controversy. Hoping to catch a glimpse of a series of tornados that swept through Kansas City, Missouri in April, chasers parked side-by-side in the middle of a well-traveled interstate, blocking the exit. Chancy Smith, the director of emergency medical services for Dickinson County, exclaimed that the crowds of chasers who inundated his county to catch these storms were morons for risking their lives and the lives of others by obstructing emergency services. He later clarified that this did not apply to the legitimate chasers who chased for research or science. A few weeks later, the National Weather Service issued an early warning to the public of several tornadoes expected that weekend. An additional alert was sent just to emergency personnel, “expect an influx of people.”
            Storm chasers also tend to be among the first available to help the survivors, arriving before emergency personnel since they are the closest. Seasoned storm chasers argue that the amateurs, like the ones blocking interstates, are giving them a bad name. The safest bet to chase a storm as an amateur is to do so through a storm chasing tour company, which can step you back anywhere from $1,000 to $4,000. Even with the hefty price tag, however, it is a thriving industry.
            Despite the controversy and amateurs giving chasing a bad name, the research we have come across from storm chasing is invaluable.  Meteorologists are able to determine exactly what conditions cause tornados, although it is still unclear exactly when and where a tornado will form. With each tornado is another chase, and another chase is another opportunity for information. In 2007, the Discovery Channel crew was able to record “mini-tornados” that rotated within a main tornado. Later on, a computer model used this information to develop a more accurate representation of tornado formation and life cycle.



4 comments:

  1. Maybe focus on the drama of it more, the danger of storm chasing. I think you could bring out some strong images, writing wise, of devastaing storms and the drama of the chase. Really paint a picture with your writing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like your topic a lot, and I think this is a good draft, with a lot of research. But, it seems as if your are bouncing around between several ideas rather then sticking to one or two, which makes your writing feel a bit choppy/divided to me. I love the picture you are beginning to paint in the opening paragraph, but it seems to get caught off for me. Perhaps you could extend it, and even make it from a storm chasers point of view. I don't know fi you know any or you can make one up based on articles you have read? Right now it seems a little abrupt to go from that paragraph to the next. And then maybe you can focus on the actually storm chasers, what they need, what there background is, how the make a living doing it, family situation, how much they travel, how do they get information for when storms are coming (the wether or can they figure it out on their own...). Anyways, it is just a thought, but great start!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Liza, I LOVE your topic. Your introduction is terrific and I echo the others that you could pull from this dark and dangerous imagery throughout the article.

    In the middle, the piece started to feel a little researchy and, while it was all interesting stuff, I think it could be livened up with more specifics about the thrills/danger/craziness of storm chasing. Perhaps give us a story about a specific storm chaser so we connect with someone.

    The paragraph on the amateur storm chasers that blocked the interstate exit lost me for just a second, but then you brought it back with the paragraph that followed. Perhaps a little more bulking there about the difference in amateurs and professionals would drive home the importance of that story.

    Last thing: this feels like it just sort of stopped with no conclusion. Is there more? If not, I'd recommend a wrapping up of some kind. Maybe bring it back around to your introduction.

    LOVE the topic and your writing is so clean and straight-forward. I can't wait to see your revision. You're definitely on the right track!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi, Liza. I think your topic is interesting and your writing engaging and strong! In thinking about Stephanie's comments to us, I think you need might need a thesis in your writing--what do you think about storm chasing (mind you, I am not suggesting "I" statements)? While you talk about the dangers, you don't really take a stand as a writer about whether or not you think it is too dangerous to do or whether these chasers are really a help or a hinderance. It seems like you voice your opinion in the end that you think chasers are valuable overall and while thesis statements can come at the end of writing, you might want to consider working it in the beginning.

    I also agree with Emily that it would be nice to have a storm chaser to connect with--perhaps some quotes as to why they do it?

    Small Tidbits: I would call Twister a Blockbuster instead of movie and italicize it. I would move the definition of storm chasers to the first paragraph and then combine the popularity of chasing with the paragraph below it.

    ReplyDelete